Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Volume 222, Issue 19
October 2019
- Previous Article
- Next Article
Article contents
-
References
OUTSIDE JEB| 01 October 2019
Julia Nowack
Julia Nowack
Liverpool John Moores University
J.Nowack@ljmu.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
This site
Author and article information
Julia Nowack
Liverpool John Moores University
J.Nowack@ljmu.ac.uk
Online ISSN: 1477-9145
Print ISSN: 0022-0949
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
2019
J Exp Biol (2019) 222 (19): jeb193060.
- Split-screen
- Views Icon Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
- Peer Review
- Open the PDF for in another window
- Article Versions Icon Versions
- Version of Record 01 October 2019
- Tools Icon Tools
Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Citation
Julia Nowack; Birds don't mind the light – if it's dim enough. J Exp Biol 1 October 2019; 222 (19): jeb193060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.193060
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager
- EasyBib
- Bookends
- Mendeley
- Papers
- EndNote
- RefWorks
- BibTex
Have you have ever been on an airplane at night and looked down on the illuminated earth? Our various light sources can be seen from miles away and the brightening of the night sky above cities even has a name – urban sky glow. Obviously, light sources at night are needed in modern civilisations, but diminishing darkness can cause severe problems, such as altering wake–sleep rhythms and affecting health. Although we have found ways to live with light pollution, other animals cannot always avoid it.
Zeynep Ulgezen, from Wageningen University in The Netherlands, and an international team of colleagues wanted to know the consequences for birds of sleeping under night illumination. For their study, the researchers caught great tit* (Parus major) from an urban and a forested area and tested whether they preferred to sleep under constant darkness or under weak green or white LED light (1.5lx). Next, they exposed the birds to constant darkness or nightly white or green illumination for 14days, and monitored the birds’ sleep, activity and how much energy they spent per night. The researchers also took blood samples from the birds before and after the treatment to determine the animals’ oxalic acid levels, a biomarker for sleep disruption, and compared the memory and learning skills of the great tit* exposed to the different light conditions, by training them to differentiate between colours and select a certain colour in return for a reward.
To their surprise, Ulgezen and her colleagues found that all of the birds preferred to sleep under light instead of in constant darkness, and – when given the choice – the birds preferred green over white light sources. When the researchers looked into the consequences of sleeping under light, they found no effect of nightly illumination on the birds’ memory and learning, and their blood levels did not show any indication of sleep disruption. However, both light sources caused the birds to be more active at night. The great tit* that slept under white light became active almost 3h earlier than those sleeping in constant darkness and half an hour earlier than those that slept under green light. Consequently, the birds facing nightly light pollution spent more energy than the birds that slept in complete darkness. But the effect of light also depended on the origin of the birds. The animals that were captured in a forest were most active under nocturnal white light, while urban birds showed the same amount of activity under green and white light.
This study suggests not only that urban birds can get used to the lights of the city, but also that birds actually prefer to have – at least a little – light at night. While the researchers have used light intensities that mimic realistic light pollution, the illumination was still relatively weak, and birds nesting under street lamps would experience light that was up to 13-fold more intense. But why do birds prefer light over darkness? Ulgezen and her colleagues suggest that the birds chose the illuminated areas for a simple reason: more light allows them more time to forage and enchant members of the opposite sex.
References
Ulgezen Z. N. Käpylä T. Meerlo P. Spoelstra
K.
,Visser
,M. E.
andDominoni
,D. M.
(2019
).
The preference and costs of sleeping under light at night in forest and urban great tit*
.
Proc. R. Soc. B
286
,
rspb.2019.0872
.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd
2019
Advertisem*nt
Email alerts
Article activity alert
Accepted manuscripts alert
Table of contents alert
Latest published articles alert
Close Modal
5,213 Views
View Metrics
Cited by
Google Scholar
2023 JEB Outstanding Paper Prize shortlist and winner
The JEB Editors are delighted to announce the shortlisted authors for the 2023 JEB Outstanding Paper Prize. Read the winning paper - Tiny spies: mosquito antennae are sensitive sensors for eavesdropping on frog calls - by Hoover Pantoja-Sanchez and Brian Leavell from Ximena Bernal's lab at Purdue University, USA.
JEB Science Communication Workshop for ECRs
If you’re an early-career researcher interested in science communication and are attending the SEB Annual Conference in Prague this summer, come a day early and join the JEB Editors at a sci comm workshop to learn the key writing skills needed to promote your research to a broad audience beyond your peers (1 July at 14.30-17.30). Places are limited to 24 attendees, and applicants should apply through the SEB registration page by 30 April 2024.
Bridging the gap between controlled conditions and natural habitats in understanding behaviour
Novel technologies enable behavioural experiments with non-model species, in naturalistic habitats and with underexplored behaviours. In their Commentary, Scholz and colleagues discuss how to obtain a deeper understanding of the natural ecology and lifestyle of study animals.
How a macrourid fish remains buoyant at depths it should be unable to reach
Fish with swimbladders should not be capable of descending below 7200m, but when Alan Jamieson and Todd Bond spotted a macrourid fish at 7259m, they knew they had seen something miraculous. Working with Imantes Priede, they reveal that the swimbladder of a 1 kg fish could hold 37.9 g of oxygen, sufficient to offset the weight of the fish's bones, and take 221-440 days to fill, which is plausible because it takes years for the fish to descend to such depths.
ECR Workshop on Positive Peer Review
Are you an ECR looking for tips on how to write concise, astute and useful manuscript reviews? If so, join the JEB Editors at a 2-hour JEB-sponsored Workshop on Positive Peer Review at the Canadian Society of Zoologists annual meeting in Moncton on 9 May 2024 at 13.00-15.00. There are 25 spaces for ECRs and selection is first come, first serve. To sign up, check the ECR Workshop box when you register for the CSZ meeting.