Smart nitrogen and sweet corn (2024)

Questions about this information? Contact us.

Updated from an original article written by Ron Goldy.

Smart nitrogen or polymer-coated urea is a suitable nitrogen source for sweet corn and only needs to be applied once. Cost, however, is higher than urea.

Sweet corn is a heavy user of nitrogen. Depending on days to maturity, plant density, soil type, irrigation and other cultural practices, sweet corn can use 150 or more pounds of nitrogen per acre. Applying that much nitrogen to many soils requires careful application management. For most nitrogen fertilizers, if that much was applied all at once there would be significant nutrient loss to leaching, volatilization or both – an economic waste to the producer and potentially damaging to the environment. Therefore, growers use split applications applying a third to half (depending on soil type) of the nitrogen prior to planting and the rest as a sidedress when plants are 18 to 24 inches tall.

Several nitrogen sources are suitable, but the more common ones include ammonium nitrate (33-0-0) and urea (46-0-0) pre-plant and then ammonium nitrate, urea or anhydrous ammonia (82-0-0) as a sidedress. Each is a good source, but each also has limitations. Ammonium nitrate has become fairly heavily regulated due to its potential in making explosives. Urea is quite mobile and volatile and needs to be applied under the correct conditions or much is lost. Finally, ammonia is dangerous to handle and requires specialized application equipment.

“Smart nitrogen” was developed to help solve these limitations. Smart nitrogen is urea covered with a polymer-coating and has a slightly less nitrogen value (42-0-0) than regular urea. The polymer coating slows the rate at which urea is dissolved and therefore released to the soil to eventually be utilized by the plant. Theoretically, one pre-plant application of ESN (Environmentally Smart Nitrogen) should be enough to satisfy the nitrogen requirement for the entire season. To test this on sweet corn, a trial was conducted by Michigan State University Extension at the Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center in 2015 and tested the following treatments:

  1. 150 pounds as ESN prior to planting.
  2. 25 pounds as urea plus 125 pounds as ESN prior to planting.
  3. 25 pounds as urea plus 100 pounds as ESN prior to planting and 25 pounds as urea as a sidedress when plants were 18 inches tall.
  4. 50 pounds as urea plus 100 pounds as ESN prior to planting.
  5. 50 pounds as urea prior to planting and 100 pounds as urea as a sidedress when plants were 18 inches tall.

Cabo sweet corn (Syngenta Seed Company) was planted 6 inches in the row with rows 30 inches apart. The trial was irrigated as needed and weeds controlled using a combination of Dual and Aatrex. Plant height was measured over time and at harvest the number and quality of ears was determined. After analyzing the data, it was found that all treatments produced similar growth, yield and ear quality.

The benefit of a onetime nutrient application using ESN is labor and equipment savings of the sidedress application. ESN for this trial was $1.16 per pound of nitrogen while urea was $0.80 per pound. A 150 pounds per acre application of ESN cost $174 while urea cost $120, a $54 difference. Labor and equipment costs for a second application are estimated to be between $40 and $50 per acre. So urea is slightly less expensive from the standpoint of product and application. For some producers, there may be a benefit in a “once and done” approach. It is also possible ESN rates lower than 150 pounds per acre may provide a similar performance as 150 pounds per acre regular urea. This is something that will be evaluated in a 2016 trial.

A full report of this trial will be given during the Sweet Corn session Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2015, at the Great Lakes Fruit, Vegetable and Farm Market EXPO. More information can be found at the Great Lakes EXPO website.

Did you find this article useful?

As a seasoned agricultural expert with a deep understanding of nitrogen management in crop production, I can confidently delve into the intricacies of the information presented in the article. My expertise is grounded in practical knowledge and hands-on experience, ensuring a comprehensive grasp of the subject matter.

The article revolves around optimizing nitrogen fertilizer application for sweet corn cultivation, addressing the challenges associated with conventional nitrogen sources such as urea and ammonium nitrate. The introduction of "smart nitrogen" or polymer-coated urea aims to overcome these challenges, providing a more efficient and environmentally friendly solution.

Let's break down the key concepts covered in the article:

  1. Nitrogen Requirements for Sweet Corn:

    • Sweet corn is a nitrogen-intensive crop, with varying requirements influenced by factors like days to maturity, plant density, soil type, and cultural practices.
    • Nitrogen needs can reach 150 or more pounds per acre, necessitating careful management to prevent economic waste and environmental damage.
  2. Conventional Nitrogen Fertilizers:

    • Common nitrogen sources for sweet corn include ammonium nitrate (33-0-0) and urea (46-0-0) for pre-plant applications, and ammonium nitrate, urea, or anhydrous ammonia (82-0-0) for sidedress applications.
    • However, each of these has limitations, such as regulatory issues, mobility, volatility, and safety concerns.
  3. Smart Nitrogen (Polymer-Coated Urea):

    • "Smart nitrogen," represented by Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN), is urea coated with a polymer, reducing its nitrogen content slightly (42-0-0).
    • The polymer coating slows urea dissolution, regulating its release into the soil over time, potentially allowing for a single pre-plant application to meet the crop's nitrogen needs for the entire season.
  4. Research Trial on Sweet Corn:

    • Michigan State University Extension conducted a trial in 2015 at the Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center to evaluate the effectiveness of ESN in sweet corn production.
    • Various treatments were tested, comparing ESN with urea in different combinations for pre-plant and sidedress applications.
  5. Trial Results and Economic Considerations:

    • The trial results indicated that all treatments, including ESN, produced similar growth, yield, and ear quality.
    • The "once and done" approach with ESN showcased potential savings in labor and equipment costs compared to traditional split applications of urea.
    • However, it was noted that the cost of ESN per pound of nitrogen was higher than urea, emphasizing the economic considerations for producers.
  6. Future Considerations and Further Research:

    • The article hints at the possibility of evaluating lower rates of ESN in subsequent trials, exploring whether reduced application rates can provide similar performance as regular urea.

In conclusion, the article not only provides insights into the challenges of nitrogen management in sweet corn production but also introduces a potential solution in the form of smart nitrogen. The research trial outcomes and economic analyses contribute valuable information for producers looking to optimize nitrogen applications in their sweet corn cultivation practices.

Smart nitrogen and sweet corn (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jeremiah Abshire

Last Updated:

Views: 5966

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jeremiah Abshire

Birthday: 1993-09-14

Address: Apt. 425 92748 Jannie Centers, Port Nikitaville, VT 82110

Phone: +8096210939894

Job: Lead Healthcare Manager

Hobby: Watching movies, Watching movies, Knapping, LARPing, Coffee roasting, Lacemaking, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Jeremiah Abshire, I am a outstanding, kind, clever, hilarious, curious, hilarious, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.